Pornsickness

Empathetic Domination

 rita_3

Do men dominate women because they lack empathy?

Over at I Blame the Patriarchy, the feminists are exchanging comments with some of the rare feminist friendly humans (with male parts) over the reasons why we are aroused by porn. Feminists with female parts tend to think that men have a simple desire to dominate women, and lack the empathy to put themselves in the place of a woman, who, they like to think, dislikes domination and wishes to avoid it.

The question is raised because one blamer with male parts claimed that a man who empathizes with women’s suffering can use empathy to drive pornographic thoughts from his head. 

Yet, his idea is pretty directly contradicted by women who fantasize about rape or coercion even though they have been raped themselves. How can they lack empathy when they have suffered directly from the brutalization of women? Obviously there’s more going on here than simply saying “I hate being dominated, therefore it can’t arouse me; and because I have been dominated, and I hated it, I am immune from arousal that is created by it.”

I may be quite wrong about everything I say on this blog. But one thing that I go back to again and again is the idea that arousal can be forced on us all by the conditioning of our culture and the self-hypnosis that masturbation creates. I’m not anti-masturbation, but I am highly suspicious of the hypnotic nature of porn and fantasy that we use to create the arousal and get off.

I’m an old human, past fifty now. My level of arousal has declined from the feverish heights of my teenaged years. Yet, before I changed my life due to feminist enlightenment, I was still trying to push the orgasm button almost as frequently as I did as a child. The addiction we develop over a lifetime of stimulation is pretty profound. 

Getting to orgasm becomes more and more difficult, though, and here is where I think we tend to use the sickness of forcible arousal to force ourselves to get off. It’s all one big clusterfuck of dominance and submission when you see it this way, and it transcends completely any male or female roles in the person getting themselves off. 

My thought is that because arousal is something we crave, and we don’t really feel strongly enough to complete a sexual act with ourselves, we seek out ideas of sex as an irresistible force that overcomes our lack of desire and fills it with the submission to this feeling that leads to orgasm. 

This is worded in such a poor way because I’m trying to put into the words the universality of my conception of arousal as something we all force on ourselves in order to feel that orgasm. Men force themselves to feel arousal by forcing women to feel arousal, either by love and attraction and flowery kittens-and-rainbows sex when young and attractive and possessed of actual magnetism, or through the fantasy of pretending that women become overcome by desire by being dominated, from the coercion of seduction to the rape-like horrors of BDSM.

My take on sexuality is based on m belief that all sexual roles are culturally-based. There is no natural or inherent bias. Everything we think of as gendered is ingrained in us from birth by our culture. Men buy into all this more easily than women because they can fool themselves into thinking that it’s essentially female to be overcome with lust and give into a degrading sexual experience. Yet, at the same time, men force themselves to come all the time when they jack off, essentially raping themselves without ever realizing it. 

I think there is a strong undercurrent of male sexuality that accepts the idea that since you enjoy forcing yourself to become aroused and to get off, that women should like it when you do them the same favor. 

So mere empathy for women is just a part of the methods by which we can detach ourselves from degrading sexual fantasies and porn. The other part is also realizing on some level that we are all trying to force ourselves to arousal and orgasm more often than we really need to be. And here is where the deepest resistance will always lie for those, like me, who willfully addicted themselves to the orgasm button decades ago.

Pornsickness
The He-Man Woman Haters Club

Comments (1)

Permalink

Book for feminists with male parts

I was replying to one of the very few who comment on this blog and thought I should take the time to make it a short post. I’m very sorry, BTW, that my blog-handling chops are so primitive that I couldn’t figure out how to manage this blog without requiring memberships. I also would like to apologize for the infrequency with which I post. I have a family and a job and they come first, though reducing and eventually evolving beyond male supremacy is always on my mind. 

You can get a little heartsick, if you think about injustice constantly. I really want to enjoy life, too. Anyway, I finished a new book about feminism.

It’s a great book for men that’s about porn and how it affects men, that could go a long way to explaining to feminist-friendly men about what they are participating in when they view porn to get off. It’s called Getting Off: Pornography and the End of Masculinity. Don’t read it yourself unless you need to find out how truly sickening the world of porn can be. 

The same wires carrying this to you are used far more often to help men hypnotize themselves into an orgasm by proving to them, over and over again, that women love being degraded and debased. This has got to be stopped. Free speech is one thing, but porn is not speech! Ask Catherine MacKinnon.
 

Pornsickness

Comments (3)

Permalink

The Brilliance Of Catherine MacKinnon

I just got my copy of Catherine MacKinnon’s Only Words in the mail and it is breathtaking. I’m afraid to even show it to my wife because I almost cried three times in the first five pages. She ruthlessly and beautifully lays out the hideous lies about pornography in the most stunning prose, effortlessly building from one undeniable truth to the next. It’s one of the greatest works of feminist thought I’ve ever read. 

Which brings me to my thought about the wanna-be feminist in The Guardian this week. He wants to help the feminist movement and is outraged that he isn’t being welcomed as God’s gift to women. We don’t need any men telling us about how it feels to be an oppressed woman, and we don’t need any men trying to help when we’ve got god-like geniuses like MacKinnon and Dworkin and even my personal hero Twisty Faster who can do it so much better than he could ever hope to. 

Pornsickness

Comments (2)

Permalink